Russell Brand is accused of violation and sexual aggression

ADVERTISING

The British police accused the Russell brand of violation and sexual aggression after an 18 -month investigation.

The London metropolitan police said that a 50 -year -old comedian and a theoretician of conspiracy are faced with various accusations of violations and sexual aggression.

The accusations concern four women, and the crimes allegedly occurred from 1999 to 2005.

In September 2023, British Media Channel 4 and Sunday Times published allegations that four women were sexual violence or violated by the brand without identifying them.

The brand, whose comedy often rotated around graphic and even cruel sexual content, denies the accusations, stating that their relationship is “always agreed.”

Famous for his unbridled and brave stood up, the brand gained fame as many radio and television programs. He wrote the memories that describe his battles with drugs and alcohol, participated in several Hollywood films and were married with the pop -star Katy Perry for a short period.

In recent years, he has disappeared in most of the main media. Nevertheless, he won a large number of subscribers on the Internet with a video that mix alternative advice on well -being and conspiracy theory, including “anti -globalist” narratives that resemble the radical movement of the canon.

He publicly turned to Christianity after the documentary about his alleged behavior went into the air and recently said that he had moved to the United States.

It is expected that the brand will appear in the London Court on May 2. Jasant Narval from the British court of the crown, the prosecutors said carefully analyzed evidence after a police investigation on charges made after the transfer of a 4 -channel documentary in September 2023.

“We came to the conclusion that the Russell brand should be accused of such crimes as a violation, sexual aggression and shameless. The Crown’s prosecution service reminds everything that the criminal proceedings are actively and that the defendant has the right to a fair trial. ”